I received in the mail today the December 2009 printed edition of Wired Magazine. Spencer Reiss has an article entitled "
RISING TIDE, Face it: Climate change is inevitable. Luckily, we know how to adapt." (Titled a little differently online). He goes on to say things like this:
As many of the participants—certainly the scientists—are only too
aware, the global war on carbon has not gone well for the atmosphere.
The really inconvenient truth: We’re toast. Fried. Steamed. Poached.
More so than even many hand-wringing carbonistas admit. According to
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, C02
that’s already in the air or in the pipeline will stoke “irreversible”
warming for the next 1,000 years. Any scheme cobbled together in
Copenhagen for slowing—forget reversing—the growth of greenhouse gases
will be way too little, way too late. In the apt jargon of industry, a
hotter planet is already “baked in.” James Lovelock, the British
chemist who redubbed Mother Earth as “Gaia,” tells the ungilded truth:
Can we hit a carbon Undo button? “Not a hope in hell.”
Rather interesting this comes out in the midst of the British Climate Research Unit (CRU) scandal, climate-gate. I'm guessing those NOAA guys based their "no going back" conclusions on this same scandalized data.
I can't help but play on 2 sets of Spencer's words: adapt, and "baked in". I'm not sure it's us, the common culture, that's going to adapt in the future. It's the junk science propagating already "adapted" data, to suit their own predestined conclusions. And those conclusions? Half-baked at best.
By the way....do you think we'll be hearing more about this in the dead-tree Main Stream Media? Doubtful.
-Colonel Steve
Recent Comments